Charlie Kirk / Friday, December 19, 2025
The Charlie Kirk Show At AmFest 2025
Charlie Kirk / Friday, July 24
"I think it's pathetic. I think it's sad. I think it's sick."
Charlie Kirk / Thursday, September 1, 2022
Jack Posobiec is in for Charlie to break down OPEC’s chess move and what it means for the Democrats heading into November. Jack welcomes Libby Emmons, EIC of The Post Millennial to detail a heartbreaking story of a father trying to save his son from being mutilated by his ex-wife. Ken Paxton dishe ...
Dennis Prager / Thursday, March 27, 2025
What’s the difference between attack plans and war plans? Has anybody noticed that they are protesting in Gaza against Hamas? Plus, will a 25% tariff on imported cars raise car prices?
Mike Gallagher / Friday, July 24
Sen. Tim Sheehy’s (MT-R) July 23, 2026, Senate floor speech opposing the latest Iran War Powers Resolution is a raw, veteran’s perspective grounded in personal loss and the Iranian regime’s long record of hostility.
Mike Gallagher / Friday, July 24
Mike Gallagher / Friday, July 24
Karoline Leavitt Says Trump’s Patience ‘Running Out’ On SAVE America Act, Thune Fires Back Trump “close” to decision on “massive attack” on Iran Trump Welcomes the World Series Champion L.A. Dodgers to White House With His Typical Humor THE ESSEX FILES: The WHCA Dinner Should Celebrate the First Amendment, Not Political Theater ‘Odyssey’ Popcorn Buckets […]
Larry Elder / Friday, July 24
Is Steve Hilton Being Treated Fairly by the Media?
Larry Elder / Wednesday, July 22
The Los Angeles Times recently published a “News Analysis” headlined: “Trump, long a critic of ‘forever wars,’ may be stumbling into one with Iran.”
Larry Elder / Friday, November 18, 2022
We still have questions about the Paul Pelosi story. They still haven’t released the video of the Pelosi home, supposedly under 24-seven surveillance cameras. To recap, just days before the midterm elections, a hammer-wielding mentally ill man—who, according to was illegally in the United States—broke into the home of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and attacked […]
Carl Jackson / Friday, July 24
In a shocking display of hypocrisy, a recent column by a prominent journalist has sparked outrage and debate in the world of sports. The article in question targets WNBA star Caitlyn Clark, accusing her of "flopping" and "endangering" her opponents. But is this criticism justified, or is it just a thinly veiled attempt to vilify a talented athlete? This episode delves into the controversy surrounding Caitlyn Clark's playing style and the journalist's column, which has been widely criticized for its tone and content. The speaker discusses the implications of the article, including its potential to divide NBA fans by race and justify racism against whites. The conversation also touches on the importance of holding athletes to the same standards as the media and the public. The speaker argues that Caitlyn Clark's playing style, while sometimes questionable, is not unique in the world of sports. Many athletes, including some of the greatest players of all time, have been accused of flopping or exaggerating contact. However, the speaker suggests that the journalist's column is not just about criticizing Clark's playing style, but about using her as a symbol of white privilege and racism. The episode is a thought-provoking exploration of the complexities of sports, racism, and the media's role in shaping public opinion. Join the conversation and listen to the full episode to hear the speaker's take on this timely and contentious issue. Follow Carl Jackson: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/carljacksonradio X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/carljacksonshow Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thecarljacksonshow Website: http://www.TheCarlJacksonShow.com Store: https://CarlJacksonStore.com
Larry O'Connor / Friday, July 24
China's Power Over The Catholic Church
Hugh Hewitt / Friday, July 24
The Smithsonian Hates American History
Hugh Hewitt / Saturday, July 25
Jim Geraghty chose yesterday to go on at some length about why superhero movies make a lot more money than opening weekend box office might indicate and to note that predictions of their demise just might be premature. His primary point is that such movies produce a number of income streams not reflected in box office numbers, which is an excellent point. I would hasten to add that these characters have survived for almost 100 years now in print indicating that they have far more life in them than one might expect. Of course the cost of producing a comic book is such that you can absorb a failure and make adjustments – not so much with multi-million dollar movie budgets. And yet, I think an analysis of what makes the characters so enduring might be worthwhile.. . .
Hugh Hewitt / Wednesday, October 16, 2024
Hugh is back today, Wednesday, October 16th, 2024, bringing you the news and talking with:
Jay Sekulow / Monday, May 4
AG Blanche Says The Evidence Will Come in the Comey Indictment